ES2 Issues

GOOD JOBS FOR ALL WHO NEED THEM
Empire State Economic Security Campaign

download pdf

The Challenge
Lack of Good Jobs
In New York State, there are over half a million unemployed adults 16 years and older, 22.9 million adults living at or below the poverty level, and nearly a quarter of a million (218,620) adults on welfare.  Jobs are hard to find and good stable jobs paying family-sustaining wages and benefits are sparse.  Although the state's economy has been in recovery for four years since employment bottomed-out nationally in mid-2003, New York  has gained back only 300,000 jobs, only slightly more than the the 273,000 jobs that it lost during the recession (March through November 2001) and the ensuing "job loss recovery" (November 2001 through May 2003).  Since the "job growth recovery" began in mid-2003, New York's 3.5 percent job growth trails the nation's 6.3 percent growth. 1

Loss of Jobs Paying Family-Sustaining Wages and Benefits
While the overall New York economy has grown at a modest rate over the past four years, the tenuous job growth recovery has been characterized by such weak wage growth that most of New York’s working families have been left treading water.  In New York, economic output per worker increased by 11.4 percent from 2000 to 2006, while average wages increased by only 1.1 percent and real wages for workers in the bottom half of the wage distribution are in fact no higher than in 2001.  Across the state, the net loss of thousands of good paying jobs has meant that the “hollowing out” of the middle of the income distribution continued at a rapid pace.   Those fortunate enough to find work after being laid off often find themselves earning less and receiving fewer benefits like health insurance and retirement plans in their new jobs. Industries in which the share of total jobs has declined, on average, provided health insurance to 68 percent of their worker force, compared to the 55 percent of workers insured in industries in which the share of jobs increased in 2004.2

New York City has not been spared this trend of declining annual earnings, hours worked, and hourly wage rates in the face of rising poverty.  From the peak of the economic expansion of the 1990s (2000/1999) to the years 2004/2003, annual earnings and hourly wage rates dropped dramatically for workers in the bottom third of the pay scale. From 2000/1999 to 2004/2003, annual earnings fell by 5.2 percent and hourly wages declined by 6.5 percent for workers the lowest earnings tier.3 

Decline in Manufacturing Jobs and Outsourcing of Job
Although there has been a decline in manufacturing jobs nationwide, the decline in upstate New York areas has been much steeper than for the U.S. as a whole. New York has lost 25 percent of its factory jobs since 2000.4  Outsourcing of U.S. jobs to other countries is a clear contributor to this problem.  830,000 U.S. service jobs are expected to move abroad by the end of 2005. By 2015, the total number of U.S. jobs expected to be moved out of the U.S. through "outsourcing" is expected to reach more than 3.3 million.5

Real Wages Outpaced by Rising Cost of Living.
Real wages — your paycheck minus inflation — are falling for most workers.  From 2002 – 2006, real median hourly wages in New York fell from $16.00 per hour to $15.678 per hour.6  Not only has the price of gasoline gone through the roof, but heating oil and gas, too. Health care costs have made a double-digit increase for several years. Property taxes are up significantly in most places, as are rents.  As a result, many working families with low or moderate wages can't really afford to live on what their jobs pay.  In New York, in 2005 one in ten working families had incomes below the official poverty thresholds and 30.5 percent had incomes below twice the poverty thresholds. In 2005, almost half a million New York lived in working poor families.7 

Welfare Recipients and Low-Wage Work
Thousands of individuals have entered the low-wage, low-skill job market under welfare reform. Almost all welfare leavers work at or below poverty wages (except those who obtained a college education). Once in a low-wage job, there is little opportunity to climb the company ladder since investment in improving the job skills or education of welfare participants after they find work is rare. Two major labor market challenges facing hard-to-employ welfare recipients warrant special attention:

  • Low levels of work readiness among hard-to-employ recipients. The individuals who remain on welfare have greater barriers to employment, including little or no prior work experience. They need an opportunity to develop employable skills before moving into unsubsidized jobs.
  • Inner cities and rural areas with high rates of joblessness.Even in regions that are experiencing strong economic growth, inner cities and remote rural areas often have an inadequate supply of jobs. Transportation and family relocation strategies may succeed in expanding job options for some individuals but they do not solve the underlying problem of persistent job shortages in depressed areas.

For low-income and working families struggling with debt, unemployment, and high housing costs, true economic growth must create well-paying jobs that can sustain their families. 

Lack of Oversight of the State’s Multi-Billion Dollars Economic Development Program
State and local governments give away billions of dollars annually to companies in the name of economic development. This huge investment in tax credits, subsides, exemptions and payments is supposed to create jobs but government oversight has been weak. A report by the Syracuse Post Standard found that half of the companies receiving economic development funds from New York State fell short of their “job goals.” Almost a quarter actually cut jobs. But the state often fails to penalize the companies that fail to meet their job requirements, even when many millions of dollars are involved.

What The Public Thinks
Working families are deeply concerned about making ends meet, obtaining affordable health insurance for themselves and their families and avoiding going deeper into debt and bankruptcy.  In national polling, when asked "what is the most important financial problem facing your family today," Americans ranked "lack of money/low wages" number 2 – second only to "health care costs." 8

  • 85 percent of Americans believe "the economy and issues of job outsourcing" is a critical problem, ranking among the top ten most important issues in America.
  • 73 percent of Americans rank "improving the economy and creating more jobs" their top priority when deciding on who gets their vote for Congress.

A New York citywide survey of 300 voters in September 2003 found that 73 percent of working households were either very worried (37 percent) or somewhat worried (37 percent) about making ends meet and being able to afford everyday things.  In addition, half of them are finding it difficult, if not impossible, to save for the future.9

ES2 Policy 
New York should commit to a rigorous job creation program that extends credits only to businesses that create family-sustaining jobs around the state and that are targeted for low and moderate income residents, especially those leaving welfare. 

New York should directly link job training and job placement for low-income and unemployed people to transportation and housing capital construction programs.  This could include a set percentage goal of hours worked on the construction project going to local residents and establishing pre-apprenticeship and union apprenticeship programs connected to the new jobs.  This would provide jobs in the building trades industry, along with vocational training, for the half million unemployed residents, 22.9 million adults living at or below the poverty level, and the 218,620 adults on welfare in New York State.  We would revitalize the economy of low-income communities and get decent jobs for more people from those communities, including women and people of color.


The 2008-2009 Session
  • New York State should enact the Empire State Jobs Program legislation creating a publicly funded transitional jobs program, primarily for individuals transitioning from welfare to work. 
  • New York State should invest at least $500 million in public jobs creation, including constructing affordable housing. The state should enact policies that target government subsidized job openings to low-income households. For example, “corporate subsidies” and public contracts should be tied to the hiring of public assistance participants and other low-income New Yorkers to fill entry-level positions.
  • New York State should create a Build NY Task Force on Construction Jobs of community-based and labor stakeholders to create strategies and set policy goals to ensure that unemployed and low-income people are prepared for and can gain access to good, permanent jobs in the construction industry:  especially via an improved employment and training infrastructure of outreach, pre-apprenticeship programs, accountable apprenticeship monitoring and hiring compliance protocols, and on-the-job troubleshooting to improve new worker retention.
  • New York State should ensure that the recently approved $2.9 billion Transportation Bond Act and the $14 billion of federal transportation money to New York include substantial increases in funding for outreach and pre-apprenticeship programs, and a minimum of 15% of labor hours for apprentices and new workers with the new construction projects.
  • The Governor’s office and the NYS Departments of Transportation (NYSDOT) and Labor should increase statewide county-by-county Equal Employment Opportunity hiring targets as a starting point.
  • New York State should ensure that corporate subsidies and tax credits result in the creation of jobs in New York State, promote the hiring of New York State residents and ensure that the jobs created are distributed throughout the state. The expiring state law governing local Industrial Development Agencies (Art. 18A General Municipal Law) should be amended to establish job performance standards; stronger reporting requirements; recoupment of subsidies from companies that fail to meet the agreed upon job creation and retention standards; and greater local control.

1 Fiscal Policy Institute, “The State of Working New York 2007: Encouraging Recent Gains but Troubling Long Term Trends”

2 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy

3 Community Service Society, “NYC Poverty in New York City, 2004” by Mark Levitan

4 Fiscal Policy Institute, “The State of Working New York 2007: Encouraging Recent Gains but Troubling Long Term Trends”

5 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy

6 Fiscal Policy Institute, “The State of Working New York 2007: Encouraging Recent Gains but Troubling Long Term Trends”

7 Fiscal Policy Institute, “The State of Working New York 2007: Encouraging Recent Gains but Troubling Long Term Trends”

8               Drum Major Institute for Public Policy

9               Drum Major Institute for Public Policy

   
 
   
Empire State Economic Security Campaign (ES2)
c/o Hunger Action Network of New York State
260 West 36th Street, Suite 504 New York, NY 10018
Phone: 212-741-8192 ext. 0# / Fax: 212-741-7236

info@hungeractionnys.org